Print to PDF: browser Print (Ctrl+P / Cmd+P)

Select Quarter:

2026Q2 2026Q1

CRD #45993 Review Period: 2026Q1 Filing: Direct 606 filer

STONEX FINANCIAL INC. (CRD #45993) — Quarterly Rule 606 vs. Amended Rule 605 Competing Market Review

Name: STONEX FINANCIAL INC. (CRD #45993) 2026Q1 Execution Quality Benchmark
Creator: Execution Reports
License: https://executionreports.com/methodology

• 0 COMPETING-MARKET EXCEPTIONS DETECTED (>1.0 BPS THRESHOLD)

Open Review Workspace → Request committee preview

Primary Routed Venues (606)

1. CITADEL SECURITIES LLC(577.2%)

2. Matrix Executions, LLC / Simplex Trading, LLC(246.5%)

3. Jane Street Capital(39.0%)

Top routed order shares

Disclosed PFOF / Rebates

$627,458.83

Avg 14.56 ¢

Competing-Market Exceptions

0 of 0

Scored cells with >1.0 bps shortfall

Data Coverage

0 mo • 0 builds

Amended 605 builds

Rule 5310.09 Exceptions Preview (0 Total)

All scored order size and routing buckets where venue net price improvement trailed mix-adjusted peers by > 1.0 bps.

Open in Workspace to Dispose →

No statistically significant competing-market shortfalls exceeding 1.0 bps were detected in this quarter’s scored cells.

FINRA Rule 5310.09 Review Packet

STONEX FINANCIAL INC.

CRD Number: 45993 • Quarter: 2026Q1 • Generated: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 20:19:56 GMT

Methodology: exq-2

Status: CLOSED QUARTER

Resolved Rule 606 Source Filings

Author / Clearing Firm	CRD	Variant / Context	Version	SHA-256 Digest	Source Document
StoneX Financial, Inc.	45993	INTL	V1	8a752cb39dcdc15d5c7a88ad357244d0108e5d52ee66e8d63a4b0c86322bc3d2	Download XML ↗

1. SEC Rule 606(a)(1) Order Routing

Quarterly non-directed customer order routing shares and net PFOF/rebates by section and venue.

Download CSV ↓

Month	Section	Execution Venue	605 Reporter	Route %	Market %	Mkt Limit %	Non-Mkt %	PFOF Mkt (¢/100)	PFOF Limit (¢/100)
202601	options	Matrix Executions, LLC / Simplex Trading, LLC	Unmapped	83.0%	27.0%	38.5%	62.2%	15.33 ¢	3.17 ¢
202601	options	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	6.5%	37.3%	16.0%	15.6%	24.72 ¢	29.92 ¢
202601	options	Jane Street Capital	JNST	6.1%	35.0%	16.7%	15.1%	29.64 ¢	27.31 ¢
202601	other_stocks	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	94.2%	71.2%	88.6%	94.6%	4.30 ¢	0.77 ¢
202601	sp500	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	94.1%	56.2%	70.6%	95.8%	6.57 ¢	1.66 ¢
202602	options	Matrix Executions, LLC / Simplex Trading, LLC	Unmapped	83.0%	26.8%	45.3%	66.9%	12.72 ¢	-1.35 ¢
202602	options	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	7.0%	34.7%	22.4%	14.5%	25.55 ¢	42.49 ¢
202602	options	Jane Street Capital	JNST	6.5%	36.8%	19.1%	14.4%	25.49 ¢	30.01 ¢
202602	other_stocks	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	92.7%	64.4%	84.7%	87.7%	4.62 ¢	1.36 ¢
202602	sp500	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	92.9%	38.2%	58.8%	42.0%	8.73 ¢	1.16 ¢
202602	sp500	Jane Street Capital	JNST	5.0%	49.8%	27.6%	41.4%	10.00 ¢	10.00 ¢
202603	options	Matrix Executions, LLC / Simplex Trading, LLC	Unmapped	80.5%	26.5%	36.0%	67.9%	11.98 ¢	3.50 ¢
202603	options	Jane Street Capital	JNST	8.0%	36.2%	24.1%	14.1%	25.60 ¢	23.94 ¢
202603	options	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	7.7%	36.8%	22.6%	13.0%	25.49 ¢	27.83 ¢
202603	other_stocks	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	91.9%	63.3%	85.3%	91.5%	5.79 ¢	0.95 ¢
202603	other_stocks	Jane Street Capital	JNST	6.0%	31.2%	9.8%	4.7%	9.76 ¢	7.89 ¢
202603	sp500	CITADEL SECURITIES LLC	CDRG	90.3%	40.5%	54.4%	37.6%	5.83 ¢	4.52 ¢
202603	sp500	Jane Street Capital	JNST	7.6%	50.1%	32.5%	47.0%	10.00 ¢	10.00 ¢

2. Venue Scorecards (Amended Rule 605)

Execution quality metrics for routed venues benchmarked against mix-adjusted competitors on identical symbols and size tiers.

Download CSV ↓

Month	Venue	Class	Notional × Lot	Fill Rate	PI Rate	NPI (bps)	Peer Bench (bps)	Coverage	Rank Pctl	Eff Spread	Speed <1s

3. Routing-Weighted Composite Quality

Implied execution quality achieved by the firm’s routing mix across the 24 amended size tiers, compared against the best and median competing venues.

Download CSV ↓

Month	Class	Notional × Lot	Metric	Firm Composite	Best Competing	Best Venue	Median Competing	Mapped Flow

4. Payment for Order Flow vs. Execution Quality

Addresses FINRA 5310.09 conflicts: comparing PFOF received (¢/100 sh) against net price improvement shortfall vs mix-adjusted peers.

Download CSV ↓

Month	Venue	Order Class	Route %	606 Net PFOF (¢/100)	NPI (bps)	Peer Bench (bps)	Delta (bps)	Ref Price	Delta (¢/100 sh)	Conflict Flag

Conflict Methodology Note: Quality delta (¢/100 sh) is estimated as Δ_bps × ref_price. A positive PFOF beside a negative delta indicates the firm received payment while the venue delivered less price improvement than competing market centers on identical symbols and size tiers.

5. Material Changes Since Prior Quarter

Changes in routing share (≥ 5 pp), newly added/dropped venues, and PFOF rate shifts since 2025Q4.

Download CSV ↓

No material shifts (≥ 5 percentage point route share or PFOF rate change) detected relative to 2025Q4.

6. Coverage, Exclusions & Standing Limitations

Mandatory regulatory disclosure of data availability, unmapped destinations, and methodological caveats.

Suppressed Cells

Cells with < 100 covered orders

Unmapped Venues

606 destinations without 605 match

Challenged / Missing 605

Venues missing monthly 605 report

Standing Review Limitations:

A venue's Rule 605 statistics describe all flow it handled, not this firm's orders.
606 route shares are per order, not per share, and list only the top 10 venues plus any venue with at least 5% of non-directed orders.
FINRA Rule 5310.09 also requires the firm's own order-level review of its executions.
This report is not legal or compliance advice.
Net price improvement is in basis points of executed notional (quote midpoint × shares). The PFOF comparison converts the difference to ¢/100 sh at the venue's average executed price; it is an estimate.